Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!decwrl!csus.edu!beach.csulb.edu!nic.csu.net!csun!kithrup!sef
From: sef@kithrup.COM (Sean Eric Fagan)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: SECURITY BUG IN INTERACTIVE UNIX SYSV386
Keywords: BAD BUG
Message-ID: <1991Feb25.083144.4056@kithrup.COM>
Date: 25 Feb 91 08:31:44 GMT
References: <1739@svin02.info.win.tue.nl> <1991Feb13.204408.15621@kithrup.COM> <389@frcs.UUCP>
Organization: Kithrup Enterprises, Ltd.
Lines: 12

In article <389@frcs.UUCP> paul@frcs.UUCP (Paul Nash) writes:
>No it wasn't.  I have tested both the uuencoded and source versions
>on a vanilla Intel (nee Bell Tech) Unix/386 V.3.2 r2.0 system, 
                                                  ^^^^^^

I did not know that anybody called their initial release of a product "2.0".

-- 
Sean Eric Fagan  | "I made the universe, but please don't blame me for it;
sef@kithrup.COM  |  I had a bellyache at the time."
-----------------+           -- The Turtle (Stephen King, _It_)
Any opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others.