Xref: utzoo comp.unix.xenix.sco:1787 comp.unix.sysv386:5424 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!mcsun!ukc!stl!robobar!ronald From: ronald@robobar.co.uk (Ronald S H Khoo) Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix.sco,comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: Microsoft C offsets BUG in 386's Message-ID: <1991Feb25.072926.12537@robobar.co.uk> Date: 25 Feb 91 07:29:26 GMT References: <1991Feb23.175948.842@hq.demos.su> <1991Feb24.025801.27275@kithrup.COM> Followup-To: comp.unix.xenix.sco Organization: Robobar Ltd., Perivale, Middx., ENGLAND. Lines: 25 sef@sco.COM (Sean Eric Fagan) writes: > Note that, > for the 2.3.0 ds, there is an SLS (lng055, I believe) which > consists of little else besides the compiler, since the 4.5ish > compiler received so many complaints. I think Sean's thinking of lng085, of which: /* As quoted from scolon!/usr/spool/uucppublic/SLS/info * New on 9/28/90: * * lng085: No longer available, replaced by lng244. * end of quote from scolon!/usr/spool/uucppublic/SLS/info */ Note that lng244 is relative to 2.3.1 DS, so apparently there is no longer a free upgrade for our friend in the Soviet Union. Still, he's got GCC so what does it matter? :-) I *can* independently confirm that lng085's compiler does not have the bug, whereas 4.85's compiler does. I'm also just about to wipe most of these compiler passes off my disc (ENOSPC), so 'scuse me... -- Ronald Khoo +44 81 991 1142 (O) +44 71 229 7741 (H)