Xref: utzoo comp.windows.ms:9643 bit.listserv.win3-l:19
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!rex!keating
From: keating@rex.cs.tulane.edu (John W. Keating)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms,bit.listserv.win3-l
Subject: Re: C++, SDK, windows development
Message-ID: <6295@rex.cs.tulane.edu>
Date: 24 Feb 91 11:14:49 GMT
References: <910222.090210.CST.SDG1@JSUCCVM1>
Organization: C.S. Dept, Tulane Univ., New Orleans, LA
Lines: 24

SDG1@JSUCCVM1.BITNET (Scott Green) writes:

>According to this week's InfoWorld (18 Feb 1991), Borland's C++ version
>2.0 allows development of Windows 3.0 applications without having to
>purchase the Windows SDK.  C++ 2.0 was introduced last week.  The package
>lists for $495 and includes the Whitewater Resource Toolkit and Charles
>Petzold's _Programming_Windows_ book.

Does this mean that C++ includes a library of it's own for windows?  Can
the SDK still be used with it?  I'd hate to think that I bought that SDK
for nothing.  (For the curious, I found it cheap, and have been waiting
for a chance to do the same with MSC6  :^)

If anyone has had a chance to review the C++ package, give us a good review.
You'll have much thanks thrown your way.

John Keating
-- 
    +-------------------------------+      +---------------------------+
    | Support the Coalition troops! |      | keating@rex.cs.tulane.edu |
+---+-------------------------------+------| John William Keating, III |
| "My heart is stone and still it trembles +---------------------------+-+
|  The world I have known is lost in shadow." |  | "If you were right,   |
+---------------------------------------------+  |  I'd agree with you!" | 
                                                 +-----------------------+