Xref: utzoo comp.sources.d:6588 comp.sources.wanted:15537 alt.sources.d:1548 alt.sources.wanted:995 news.admin:12478 news.groups:28311
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wotan!moxie!texsun!male!newstop!sun-barr!apple!bionet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!hsdndev!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d,comp.sources.wanted,alt.sources.d,alt.sources.wanted,news.admin,news.groups
Subject: Re: CALL FOR VOTES -- comp.sources.reviewed
Message-ID: <4989:Mar123:50:0391@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 1 Mar 91 23:50:03 GMT
References: <1991Feb28.053121.7739@rick.doc.ca> <1991Feb28.160555.8446@sparky.IMD.Sterling.COM> <1991Mar1.082855.149@tfl.dk>
Organization: IR
Lines: 10

In article <1991Mar1.082855.149@tfl.dk> karsten@tfl.dk writes:
> Journals use paper mail for transporting papers.  After the paper has
> been reviewed, it must be typeset, and proff read.  These things takes
> time.

And you're implying that since comp.sources.reviewed will use e-mail
instead, it will run smoothly? Be serious. Referees have always been and
will always be the biggest bottleneck in journal publication.

---Dan