Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!mintaka!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!spool.mu.edu!samsung!sdd.hp.com!hplabs!pyramid!lstowell From: lstowell@pyrnova.pyramid.com (Lon Stowell) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: CODEX V.32bis Modems: Experiences? Keywords: codex v32bis v.32bis Message-ID: <146559@pyramid.pyramid.com> Date: 28 Feb 91 18:43:43 GMT Sender: daemon@pyramid.pyramid.com Reply-To: lstowell@pyrnova.pyramid.com (Lon Stowell) Organization: Pyramid Technology Corp., Mountain View, CA Lines: 33 In article <1952@public.BTR.COM> thad@public.BTR.COM (Thaddeus P. Floryan) writes: > >The situation with V.32 is NOT like the decade-ago horrors of 1200 baud >operation. Either the modems ARE compliant or they ARE NOT compliant. > Check the European homologation lists....the PTT's over there are pretty fussy about compliance. However, rather than continuing the "my modem is more compliant than your modem" theme.... > >From the anecdotes I presented regarding the "troublesome site" which, by the >way, if you haven't figured it out yet, is H-P Labs in Palo Alto (5 or 6 miles >from both Lon's and my sites), there must be "something" about the latest model >CODEX 2264 with MNP 5 which either: > > - prevents it operating well with other V.32 compliant modems, > - still exhibits multi-mode handshaking problems, or > - is so difficult to setup that not even H-P's experts can do it. > The Codex certainly has never been accused of being intuitively obvious to configure. I has a LOT of options...much like the TB series. Small mismatches in just about any of them will prevent higher speed use. Since you are local, you can contact Codex locally at 415-341-1616. Ask for either Don Kelly or Bruce Stewart and you should be able to get a set-up manual for the Codex unit. If you are still unable to connect, I might be able to help if you provide the setup on your modem and the Codex....although as you noted, it is not your nickel...