Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!cs.widener.edu!dsinc!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request
From: Robert_Swenson.OSBU_North@xerox.com
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom
Subject: Re: Area Code 408 and 1+ Dialing
Message-ID: <telecom11.168.2@eecs.nwu.edu>
Date: 28 Feb 91 23:17:17 GMT
Sender: news@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Mr. News)
Organization: TELECOM Digest
Lines: 19
Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 168, Message 2 of 15
Originator: telecom@delta.eecs.nwu.edu
X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu
Nntp-Posting-Host: hub.eecs.nwu.edu
X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu


 From John Higdon (john@zygot.ati) who wrote:

>> Robert_Swenson.OSBU_North@xerox.com writes:

> This is sometimes confusing.  I work in AC 408 where the 1 before the
> AC is NOT PERMITTED (this is in Santa Clara county),

It was my understanding that '1' was made permissive a few years ago.
Are you sure it is your telephone exchange that does not permit using
a '1' and not your in house system? If so, I would be very interested
to know what prefix does not allow the '1'.

I just tried and my in house system still will not permit +1 (415) xxx
xxxx.  As your note asks, I do not know what Pac Bell will do
directly.  My work phone is (408) 737 xxxx


Bob Swenson