Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usenet!talon.UCS.ORST.EDU!news.cs.indiana.edu!arizona.edu!arizona!dave
From: dave@cs.arizona.edu (Dave P. Schaumann)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Tough stupid array question
Message-ID: <981@caslon.cs.arizona.edu>
Date: 1 Mar 91 20:31:45 GMT
References: <1991Feb27.054609.10792@nlm.nih.gov> <10362@dog.ee.lbl.gov> 
 <1991Mar1.013852.9036@nlm.nih.gov> <91059.215903DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU>
Distribution: usa
Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson
Lines: 14

In article <91059.215903DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU> DOCTORJ@SLACVM.SLAC.STANFORD.EDU (Jon J Thaler) writes:
>Regarding bounds checking...
>
>[method deleted]

	Bounds checking in arrays can be done quite easily in C++, by
	overloading  the [] operator... (Just a thought.  If you *really*
	need to do index checking, you might consider switching.)

-- 
		Dave Schaumann		dave@cs.arizona.edu
'Dog Gang'!  Where do they get off calling us the 'Dog Gang'?  I'm beginning to
think the party's over.  I'm beginning to think maybe we don't need a dog.  Or
maybe we need a *new* dog.  Or maybe we need a *cat*! - Amazing Stories