Path: utzoo!mnetor!tmsoft!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!MITCH.ENG.SUN.COM!wmb
From: wmb@MITCH.ENG.SUN.COM (Mitch Bradley)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Re: broken cmForth
Message-ID: <9102262026.AA01458@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 26 Feb 91 18:58:42 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: Mitch Bradley <wmb%MITCH.ENG.SUN.COM@SCFVM.GSFC.NASA.GOV>
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 10

> That FOR NEXT is slightly inferior in this
> case doesn't sound the death nell for me as it seems for you.  Perhaps
> one of the straws on the camels back, but not that interesting in and
> of itself.

I was not trying to make the point that FOR .. NEXT is bad; rather I
was noting that, contrary to some earlier messages that were going
around, DO .. LOOP does have some nice uses.

Mitch