Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!ucbvax!MITCH.ENG.SUN.COM!wmb
From: wmb@MITCH.ENG.SUN.COM
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Hearing?
Message-ID: <9102271414.AA28018@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: 27 Feb 91 03:57:39 GMT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: wmb%MITCH.ENG.SUN.COM@SCFVM.GSFC.NASA.GOV
Organization: The Internet
Lines: 10

> Well, although Jack's actions were not done during a meeting, they were all
> made publicly and we all knew precisely what he did.  There was no need for
> charges to be brought against him.  Thus there was no need for him to be given
> the chance to defend himself against any charges.  The facts were self evident
> in this case.  There was no hearing and there were no accusations.  The Board
> voted on the public evidence (most of which is still here today).

I think this is crap.

Mitch Bradley, wmb@Eng.Sun.COM