Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!apple!agate!usenet
From: dc@caveat.berkeley.edu (Dave Cottingham)
Newsgroups: comp.os.mach
Subject: Q: Mach vs. Amoeba: what's the diff?
Message-ID: <1991Feb27.234037.27280@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 27 Feb 91 23:40:37 GMT
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator)
Organization: Center for Particle Astrophysics, UC Berkeley
Lines: 9

Lately I've been reading some papers on Mach, and some papers on
Amoeba, and though I wouldn't say they have the same look-and-feel,
the more I read the more they look the same.  I am hoping someone
could point out some functional differences between the two, or direct
me to a publication comparing them.

Thanks,
Dave Cottingham
dc@caveat.berkeley.edu