Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!pmw1 From: PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu (Peter M. Weiss) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: Re: SNA tunneling? Message-ID: <91059.110657PMW1@psuvm.psu.edu> Date: 28 Feb 91 16:06:57 GMT References: <1991Feb28.152833.12503@b11.ingr.com> Organization: Penn State University Lines: 25 In article <1991Feb28.152833.12503@b11.ingr.com>, allen@b11.ingr.com (John Allen) says: >in article , bob@MorningStar.Com >(Bob Sutterfield) says: >> >> Is anyone working on a standard for IP tunneling over SNA networks? >> That is, given an existing SNA network, and a desire to use it for IP >> transport, is there an equivalent to any of RFCs 1201, 1188, 1171, >> 1149, 1088, 1042, and 877? >> >> (OK, I just mentioned 1149 to see if you were really watching :-) >Harris - Adacom has TCP/IP over LU6.2. As far as I am aware, IBM's TCP/IP For MVS can do this too (except it uses LU_0 ) and it is called SNALINK. ref: "TCP/IP For MVS Installation and Connections" form GG24-3412-00 /Pete -- Peter M. Weiss | pmw1 @ PSUADMIN | psuvm.psu.edu|psuvm 31 Shields Bldg - PennState Univ.| ^ affiliated with psuvm.psu.edu|psuvm University Park, PA USA 16802 | Secrecy is the guardian of bureaucracy