Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!cmcl2!uupsi!sunic!news.funet.fi!cc.tut.fi!cc.tut.fi!eero From: eero@lehtori.tut.fi (Pajarre Eero) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: Re: Apollo problem list / tirade... Message-ID: Date: 1 Mar 91 08:42:15 GMT References: <9102252009.AA09593@hwcae.cfsat.honeywell.com> <2347@tuvie.UUCP> <5011a566.3593b@digital.sps.mot.com> Sender: eero@cc.tut.fi (Pajarre Eero) Organization: Tampere Univ. of Technology, Finland. Lines: 36 In-Reply-To: chen@digital.sps.mot.com's message of 27 Feb 91 18:36:01 GMT In article <5011a566.3593b@digital.sps.mot.com> chen@digital.sps.mot.com (Jinfu Chen) writes: While I agree with the first point (default template is no sufficient), there's no need to be panic for a wide open `node_data, PROVIDED following directories are protected: `node_data/etc and below `node_data/cron and below `node_data/dev -- Jinfu Chen (602)898-5338 Motorola, Inc. SPS Mesa, AZ ...uunet!motsps!digital!chen chen@digital.sps.mot.com CMS: RXFR30 at MESAVM ---------- Nope, it is not enough that the subdirectories are protected. Their protection doesn't matter if some upper directory gives you write/delete rights. If there exists anybody in the whole world, who knows the "meaning" of each file in the /sys tree, and the reasons for their protections, I would really like to know ... eero -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eero Pajarre eero@tut.fi tel: +358-31-162189 Tampere University of Technology fax: +358-31-162913 PO Box 527, SF-33101 Tampere, FINLAND