Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uwm.edu!psuvax1!hsdndev!cmcl2!uupsi!sunic!ugle.unit.no!lise.unit.no!stigvi
From: stigvi@Lise.Unit.NO (Stig Vidar Hovland)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st.tech
Subject: Re: Defragger
Message-ID: <1991Feb12.104255.23440@ugle.unit.no>
Date: 12 Feb 91 10:42:55 GMT
References: <1991Feb7.090026@ncsuvx.enet.dec.com> <BAMMI.91Feb11140033@acae127.cadence.com>
Sender: news@ugle.unit.no
Reply-To: stigvi@Lise.Unit.NO (Stig Vidar Hovland)
Organization: Norwegian Institute of Technology
Lines: 10

In article <BAMMI.91Feb11140033@acae127.cadence.com>, bammi@acae127.cadence.com (Jwahar R. Bammi) writes: 
|> i seem to remember trying one from atari called chkdsk or something
|> like that. it was slower than molasses, and the user interface really
|> sucked. i would stay away from that one. i wish the author of tuneup
|> would fix his util for large partitions. sans that problem, i have
|> used it for many years with great success.

Chkdsk3 is not that bad. It is fast and can handle partitions > 16MB.

Stig Vidar Hovland