Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!eagle.wesleyan.edu!flinton
From: flinton@eagle.wesleyan.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds
Subject: Re: CALL FOR DISCUSSION ON NEW GROUP
Message-ID: <1991Feb28.195242.39518@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
Date: 1 Mar 91 00:52:42 GMT
References: <16859@accuvax.nwu.edu> <6420@idunno.Princeton.EDU> <70889@microsoft.UUCP> <16890@accuvax.nwu.edu>
Organization: Wesleyan University
Lines: 15

In article <16890@accuvax.nwu.edu>, kaufman@delta.eecs.nwu.edu (Michael L. Kaufman) writes:
> ...  I would object to (and vote no to) a new group called 
> comp.sys.hp because  ...

Remember, there already _is_ a group called comp.sys.hp.  You _can't_ have two!

But, as regards "comp.sys.hp48", do you really want the name to suggest that
hp28 or 55 or 35 or 110 users shouldn't bother looking here?  (OK, the HP110
is a stretch for handhelds, but I have one and ... )  Maybe comp.sys.hh.hp ?

> Michael Kaufman 
>  kaufman@eecs.nwu.edu 

-- Fred    <flinton@eagle.Wesleyan.EDU>    [BTW, thanks to everett@hpcvra and
    tt@euler.jyu.fi for HP110 feedback; expect e-mail from me towards 3/25/91]