Xref: utzoo comp.sys.mac.programmer:22172 comp.sys.mac.misc:8888
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!caen!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!2fmlcalls
From: 2fmlcalls@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer,comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: avoid IM DA 2.0
Message-ID: <28813.27cb0006@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 27 Feb 91 06:40:38 GMT
References: <1991Feb19.183333.8629@fcom.cc.utah.edu> <1991Feb26.102614.6071@Neon.Stanford.EDU>
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 19

In article <1991Feb26.102614.6071@Neon.Stanford.EDU>, cheshire@Neon.Stanford.EDU (Stuart David Cheshire) writes:
> I too have written twice to Bernard Gallet about getting IM DA 2.0, and I have
> heard nothing either.
> 
> Stuart Cheshire (cheshire@cs.stanford.edu)

Someone the other day sent me a letter (snail) verifying that in fact I'm at
the same address before sending me a check for source code.  With this IM DA
2.0 problem, it occurred to me that this person had a pretty good idea.

I would suggest that anyone expecting to send shareware money to an author in
hopes of receiving something in return - try sending a letter first explaining
that a shareware 'order' will follow if the author responds.  Unless you need
'it' in a hurry, this should save some anger.

Now, if the author responds, "Sure, send the check..." and THEN doesn't follow
through, roast 'em.

john calhoun