Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!sarah!news From: derek@coco2.albany.edu (Cinderella Man) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc Subject: Re: give me solid facts: why is the mac better than MeSsy DOS/WINDOWS Keywords: rumour Message-ID: <1991Feb28.163514.18832@sarah.albany.edu> Date: 28 Feb 91 16:35:14 GMT References: <91.056.16:01:18@ira.uka.de> <12608@helios.TAMU.EDU> <91058.234938CXT105@psuvm.psu.edu> Sender: news@sarah.albany.edu (News Administrator) Reply-To: derek@leah.albany.edu (Cinderella Man) Organization: Computin' Fools, SUNY Albany Lines: 29 Nntp-Posting-Host: coco2.albany.edu In article <91058.234938CXT105@psuvm.psu.edu> CXT105@psuvm.psu.edu (Christopher Tate) writes: >(* Wolfgang Strobl says some non-trivial things about Windows for the PC > being able to do the things that have been touted as major Macintosh > strengths, such as the Clipboard metaphor. *) > [thangs deleted] >Also: granted that Windows can do these things; what about OS/2? Or >is Windows supposed to be the new standard OS/GUI for MS-DOS machines? >I don't believe IBM would be very happy about that... The latest IBM rumour I've heard says that the next version, OS/3(?), will combine support for BOTH Windows- and OS/2-based programs. As I say this is a rumour, I heard it from a DOShead down the hall, so I can't vouch for its validity. Imagine how big the software will be, though... they'll have to distribute it like Apple does AU/X: CD-ROM or hard drive. And the minimum system requirements, too! Whew! >Christopher Tate | "Living in a fisheye lens, caught > | in the camera eye; I have no >cxt105@psuvm.psu.edu | heart to lie: I can't pretend a >{...}!psuvax1!psuvm.bitnet!cxt105 | stranger is a long-awaited friend." >cxt105@psuvm.bitnet | -- Rush, "Limelight" > Derek L. -- We can go from Rocket's Red Glare Down to "Brother can you spare--"