Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!noao!asuvax!stjhmc!p88.f15.n300.z1.fidonet.org!Lawson.English
From: Lawson.English@p88.f15.n300.z1.fidonet.org (Lawson English)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: HLock Function List
Message-ID: <3690.27CBC1F2@stjhmc.fidonet.org>
Date: 25 Feb 91 02:11:59 GMT
Sender: ufgate@stjhmc.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:300/15.88 - Tucson Apple Core, Tucson AZ
Lines: 17

Brain in Neutral writes in a message to All

BIN> If Apple wants to come out and say: these routines don't move 
BIN> memory, *and they nevery will*, find. Until then, I'll stick 
BIN> by my statement that it's safest to assume that any ToolBox routine 
BIN> might. 
BIN> Is that over-cautious, or simply prudent

I think that HLock and HUnlock are pretty safe...


Lawson
 

--  
Uucp: ...{gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!300!15.88!Lawson.English
Internet: Lawson.English@p88.f15.n300.z1.fidonet.org