Xref: utzoo comp.unix.internals:2190 comp.unix.wizards:24304 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!noao!amethyst!arizona!chrisn From: chrisn@cs.arizona.edu (Christopher E. Niswander) Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals,comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: newsreaders may ignore comp.unix.wizards Summary: Regarding drivellers... Message-ID: <977@caslon.cs.arizona.edu> Date: 28 Feb 91 22:41:10 GMT References: <2590@root44.co.uk> <1991Feb25.142140.4552@gjetor.geac.COM> <1991Feb27.014901.5228@csn.org> Followup-To: comp.unix.internals, comp.unix.wizards Organization: U of Arizona CS Dept, Tucson Lines: 30 In article <1991Feb27.014901.5228@csn.org>, cdash@margaux.colorado.edu (Charles Shub) writes: > In article adeboer@gjetor.geac.COM (Anthony DeBoer) writes: > => In article <2590@root44.co.uk> gwc@root.co.uk (Geoff Clare) writes: > => >A little investigation revealed that my newsreader (nn) had ignored it > => >because my .newsrc still had a line left over from the last incarnation of > => >comp.unix.wizards showing articles 1-19898 as read. As the re-created > => >group started again from article number 1, nn has been treating all > => >articles as already read. Other newsreaders may be doing the same. > => > => Now, isn't this the sort of thing that would only be caught by a wizard? This > > OBVIOUSLY NOT. Just look at the drivel that has appeared here since the > recreattion. You don't have to catch that glitch to read comp.unix.wizards; you only need to have a .newsrc that was created since the last incarnation. So we drivelling newcomers with new accounts (or who just happened to completely re-initialize our .newsrc for some reason) can read comp.unix.wizards without even having to think. Only old-timers with old accounts must catch the problem to read the newsgroup. So maybe the restart glitch _does_ have an influence on the recent drivel quotient of comp.unix.wizards, but an effect _opposite_ to what Geoff Clare might have expected. ;^) chrisn@cs.arizona.edu (Chris Niswander / PO Box 857 / Oracle AZ 85623) Disclaimer: I didn't write this. Someone else is using my account. I am in a small village in Baja California 80 miles from the nearest telephone, getting ready for the eclipse. Disclaimer': I don't believe my opinions; why should you?