Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!helios!bcm!dimacs.rutgers.edu!seismo!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!uxa.cso.uiuc.edu!jakg1190
From: jakg1190@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (J. 'Priapus' Kmiecik)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Norton cache and Windows
Message-ID: <1991Feb28.185736.17694@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 28 Feb 91 18:57:36 GMT
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Lines: 17

There has been some talk here about which hard drive cache is best to use
with Windows 3.  I have Norton Utilities 5 and have used the fast-cache
version (ncache-f) included in the package for the DOS environment.  How
well will this cache program work with windows and how does it compare with
Smartdrive.sys or other Windows-capable caches?  Are there any potential
problems using ncache-f and windows?

Thanks for your help.

	-Joe


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joe Kmiecik                                  "There is only one thing worse 
E-mail: jakg1190@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu             than being talked about, and 
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign    that is not being talked about."