Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsj!cbnewsi!cbnewsh!warren
From: warren@cbnewsh.att.com (warren.a.montgomery)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x
Subject: Re: GUI WARS!
Summary: One size does not fit all
Message-ID: <1991Feb28.140053.16741@cbnewsh.att.com>
Date: 28 Feb 91 14:00:53 GMT
References: <9102252115.AA07726@statsci.com> <22979@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1991Feb28.003512.9980@dsd.es.com>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 23

Gee, it sure would be more convenient if the whole world spoke the
same language, or if we all ate the same kinds of food, or if we
all wore the same style of clothes, BUT NONE OF THESE THINGS WILL
EVER HAPPEN, BECAUSE PEOPLE DON'T REALLY WANT THAT,
SO WHY IS ALL OF THIS ENERGY BEING WASTED ON GUI WARS!

The OpenLook versus Motif war is like the war between emacs and
vi, or ASCII and EBCIDIC, or Fortran and Cobol, all of which are
still healthy.  Once users learn how to do something, they want
to be able to keep doing that thing the same way.  Since millions
of users have already learned how to do all of the things that
GUI's do in several different ways, one size will not fit all.
I'm sure most users out there simply want all of their tools to be
usable with the interface they already know (which is likely to be
niether OpenLook nor Motif).  Toolkits and libraries that let the
user pick the interface seem the obvious solution, so why not
spend our energies on these rather than debate which one will
win.  They will probably all be around a lot longer than we will.

-- 

	Warren Montgomery
	att!ihlpf!warren