Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!bunker!wtm From: 34AEJ7D@CMUVM.BITNET (Bill Gorman) Newsgroups: misc.handicap Subject: AIRPORT SECURITY (again) Message-ID: <17833@bunker.UUCP> Date: 27 Feb 91 04:40:34 GMT Sender: wtm@bunker.UUCP Reply-To: 34AEJ7D@CMUVM.BITNET (Bill Gorman) Distribution: misc Lines: 64 Approved: wtm@bunker.UUCP Fidonet: Blink Talk Conference Index Number: 13685 set diatribe mode ON. Carla: You are on the right track, but for the wrong reasons in your comments about airport security. Security, real, actual, honest-to-God security in the air as a result of these searches, etc., is an illusion. The problem is that the abled flying public has established a system of security checks which THEY can pass through relatively easily. Think not? Tell me the last time you saw a wheelchair accessible airliner; not terminal, not jetway, but AIRLINER. You haven't, and you won't until the airlines are forced to change their ways by legislation. They know that. Look how they screamed and squirmed to get a loophole created for themselves in tht ADA. The whole system, their security setup in particular, is designed by and for the abled. Not so the disABLED; blind or otherwise. As an example: I have been MI for many years (as well as VI) and I fly a LOT for business - definitely NOT for pleasure, Gawd no! I have NEVER gone through a security counter where the personnel (bear in mind that the usual security people at an airport are part-timers, retirees, etc., contracted to the airline/airport by one or another rent-a-cop company) knew how to determine if a person was wearing a brace, prosthesis, or whatever. In many cases, they do not even know how to properly use the hand-held metal detectors. I have seen them on more than one occasion trying to scan someone in a wheelchair, right up against all that nice metal in the chair. This is always done out in plain sight of the other passengers, and IT IS DONE FOR THEIR BENEFIT, NOT FOR ANY QUESTION OF SAFETY. They are saying to you, the flying public, "See, we're making sure this nasty ol' cripple, whom we all know is probably diseased and crazy, doesn't try to harm our pretty airliner or any of the plastic-perfect people in it." No, I am not being bitter or "angry" here. I am trying to characterize the attitude, sometimes clearly expressed, of airport security personnel toward the disABLED. You say the answer to all this is to "train" the airport security geeks. No, I disagree. The situation will change when, and only when, IMHO, there is legislation holding the airports, the gate security people, the rent-a-cop outfits they work for and the corporate officers thereof, responsible for providing proper, UNIFORM, security screening for everyone in as non-invasive a manner as possible, including training for proper handling of all the special situations that will be encountered. Legislation that includes stiff penalties for violation of these requirements, and relatively easy complaint handling procedures for anyone not accorded proper treatment. We're not talking arguing who can sit in what row onboard the plane now. Oh, no. We're talking who, in the disABLED community, can even make it through all of the artificial barriers placed before them to even go ON the damn airliner. IMHO, we of the disABLED community are our own worst enemies here. To get changes made, we have to make our needs known. To do that, we have to make ourselves visible, we have to give up some of the carefully cultivated "I'm OK, you're OK" camouflage we have developed over the years. That is NOT easy for any of us. But don't get me started on that. End diatribe. W. K. (Bill) Gorman