Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!olivea!apple!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!gateway!dont-send-mail-to-path-lines
From: katefans@WORLD.STD.COM (Chris'n'Vickie of Chicago)
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Subject: Re: :-( :-( Kate didn't win :-(
Message-ID: <1991Feb25.041438.29218@world.std.com>
Date: 25 Feb 91 04:14:38 GMT
References: <9102210510.AA17565@das.llnl.gov>
Sender: Love-Hounds-request@ims.alaska.edu
Organization: The World @ Software Tool & Die
Lines: 14
Approved: Love-Hounds@hayes.ims.alaska.edu

In article <1991Feb25.003110.16880@cs.dal.ca> graham@UG.CS.DAL.CA (Michael Graham) writes:
>In article <9102210510.AA17565@das.llnl.gov> ed@das.llnl.GOV (Edward Suranyi) writes:
>>
>>Kate didn't win the Grammy for Alternative music.  In fact, they
>>didn't even announce the nominees!  They just said that Sinead
>>O'Connor won.
>>
>Who decides what is alternative anyway? The whole awards show was pretty
>much of a joke. I agreed with about 3 of the winners. We can take consola-
>tion in the fact that The Sensual World came out in '89!
>
No consolation. The eligible nominee date started Oct 1, 1989. :-(

Vickie (trying to start a Niall Irving fan club :-)