Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu!csn!boulder!daemon From: markat@cyrano.llnl.gov (Mark Tassinari) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.sys.cisco Subject: Network config questions Message-ID: <32870@boulder.Colorado.EDU> Date: 5 Mar 91 05:03:07 GMT Sender: daemon@boulder.Colorado.EDU Lines: 48 Greetings. We just purchased a number of cisco AGS+ routers and intend to begin routing IP, DECnet and eventually Appletalk. I have heard somewhere that sites are configuring their nets to take advantage of cisco's high bandwidth backplane. We were hoping to do this also, but are running into some problems with regard to IP addressing. I hope someone that has traveled this road can offer some advice on how to set up the IP addressing. The concept was simple. Rather than having a 10Mb ethernet connect all the node routers together we would connect them to a single cisco and use the backplane as the backbone. Bld1 Bld2 Bld3 \ | / \ | / --------- --------- --------- --------- | Node1 | | Node2 | | Node3 | | Node4 | | cisco | | cisco | | cisco | | cisco | --------- --------- --------- --------- \ \ / / \ \ / / \ \ / / \ \ / / \ \ / / ------------- | hub | | cisco | ------------- Each of the Bldx networks is assigned one class B subnet. My big question is, what's the best way to address the node<->hub links? Its seems wasteful to use a class B subnet for each. We tried mucking with the netmask to make a single subnet into a number of smaller subnets and using one of these small subnets on each link. We then got into trouble with conflicting netmasks. Is there a better way? Thanks. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mark Tassinari markat@cyrano.llnl.gov Lawrence Livermore National Lab (415) 422-4090 PO Box 808 L-408 Livermore, CA 94550