Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uunet!valid!napalm!micki
From: micki@napalm.valid.com (Micki Stone)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: Turbo C++ update
Keywords: turbo update
Message-ID: <198@valid.valid.com>
Date: 4 Mar 91 20:59:08 GMT
References: <22@medicod.UUCP>
Sender: news@valid.com
Distribution: comp.lang.c++
Lines: 18

matt@medicod.UUCP (Matt Smith) writes:

>I just got a form from Borland to upgrade my Turbo C++ from 1.0x to what

>1 - Does it compile faster as they claim?  The version I have sure is slow.

>2 - Does it really compile Windows 3.0 without MS SDK?  I would really
>	like to do some windows development.

I just received the upgrade.  Although I have not done any timing analysis
on the compiler, I haven't really noticed a difference.  As for question
2... if you want to develop windows applications that are textually based
(no editing of graphics in the window), you can do that without the 
Microsoft sdk.  The upgrade has a Whitewater kit that allows the 
development of windows graphical elements like scroll bars, buttons,
windows, etc.

Michelle