Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!pitt!willett!ForthNet
From: ForthNet@willett.pgh.pa.us (ForthNet articles from GEnie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
Subject: Feedback to the Forth Interest Group
Message-ID: <2432.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us>
Date: 4 Mar 91 13:19:16 GMT
Organization: (n.) to be organized.  But that's not important right now.
Lines: 23

Category 1,  Topic 2
Message 117       Sun Mar 03, 1991
B.RODRIGUEZ2 [Brad]          at 10:22 EST
 
> Well,although Jack's actions were not done during a meeting, they
 > were all made publicly and we all knew precisely what he did.
 > There was no need for charges to be brought against him.  Thus
 > there was no need for him to be given the chance to defend himself
 > against any charges.  The facts were self evident in this case.
 > There was no hearing and there were no accusations.  The Board
 > voted on public evidence (most of which is still here today).

This could be shortened to "we know he's guilty, so who needs a trial?"  If
you want to exercise executive power to fire someone, fine; but calling this a
"hearing" is a travesty.

- Brad

-----
This message came from GEnie via willett.  You *cannot* reply to the author
using e-mail.  Please post a follow-up article, or use any instructions
the author may have included (USMail addresses, telephone #, etc.).
Report problems to: dwp@willett.pgh.pa.us _or_ uunet!willett!dwp