Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!newstop!texsun!convex!usenet From: tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Which to use :- Perl, Python, Icon, ... ? Message-ID: <1991Mar07.220237.3563@convex.com> Date: 7 Mar 91 22:02:37 GMT References: <1073@caslon.cs.arizona.edu> Sender: usenet@convex.com (news access account) Reply-To: tchrist@convex.COM (Tom Christiansen) Distribution: comp Organization: CONVEX Software Development, Richardson, TX Lines: 16 Nntp-Posting-Host: pixel.convex.com From the keyboard of cjeffery@cs.arizona.edu (Clinton Jeffery): :From article , by bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan): :Generally, my guess is that you would find Icon better for complex :string analysis tasks that don't fit into neat regular expressions, :or for programs that use extracted information in complex ways. :Perl looks better for the jobs that it was designed to handle. As in? What kind of "complex ways" are you talking about? I think that's what the poster wants. --tom -- I get so tired of utilities with arbitrary, undocumented, compiled-in limits. Don't you? Tom Christiansen tchrist@convex.com convex!tchrist