Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!nic.csu.net!beach.csulb.edu!csus.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!fcom.cc.utah.edu!npd.novell.com!newsun!tporczyk From: tporczyk@na.excelan.com (Tony Porczyk) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.apps Subject: Re: Asking advice on Nortons 5.0 Message-ID: <1991Mar1.025906.21936@novell.com> Date: 6 Mar 91 02:18:32 GMT Sender: news@novell.com ( Lines: 19 The News Manager) Nntp-Posting-Host: na Reply-To: tporczyk@na.excelan.com (Tony Porczyk) Organization: Standard Disclaimer References: <12385.27b6f0b4@ecs.umass.edu> <2639@enea.se> <2705@enea.se> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 1991 02:59:06 GMT In article <2705@enea.se> jan@enea.se (Jan Wester) writes: > But over to Norton 5.0. Yes I have tried it and I agree with Otto J. Makela > The principle of combining several programs into one is not good and this > menuing shit.... I tried Norton 5.0. I was lucky I didn't overwrite the Norton 4.5 installation so I didn't have to reinstall it. Norton 5.0 is a joke. If I want cutsy shells and lots of useless overhead, I'll buy Cute Tools. I have a feeling we should say bye-bye to Norton Utilities after the buyout by Symantec. What will be next? Norton Commander will go graphical? John Socha - are you going to write something fast and useful to bring back the memory of the old Norton stuff? Say yes.... Tony