Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!uupsi!intercon!news
From: kdb@macaw.intercon.com (Kurt Baumann)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: MacTCP
Message-ID: <27D2B70D.A0F@intercon.com>
Date: 4 Mar 91 21:07:25 GMT
References: <1991Mar01.170733.9543@group1.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@intercon.com (USENET The Magnificent)
Reply-To: kdb@macaw.intercon.com (Kurt Baumann)
Organization: InterCon Systems Corporation
Lines: 34

In article <1991Mar01.170733.9543@group1.UUCP>, jim@group1.uucp (Jim Haile) 
writes:
> Path: intercon!uupsi!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!group1!jim
> From: jim@group1.uucp (Jim Haile)
> Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
> Subject: MacTCP
> Keywords: MacTCP
> Message-ID: <1991Mar01.170733.9543@group1.UUCP>
> Date: 1 Mar 91 17:07:33 GMT
> Sender: jim@group1.UUCP (Jim Haile)
> Organization: Group One, Ltd.; San Francisco
> Lines: 12
> 
> We use MacTCP in an application that gets info from our Unix based 
> database onto our Macs.  It works great now through Ethernet but we 
> are contemplating adding a 56K line to a remote office and I am 
> concerned about MacTCP.  Will it time out at this slower speed?  Has 
> anyone tried this?  
> Thanks, 
> Jim
> 
> -- 
> Jim Haile
> Group One, Ltd.
> uunet!group1!jim

From my understanding you should not have any problems.  I know there is a 
problem at 9600.  I do know that Apple is working on that problem, but we use 
our product out over the net at 56K without any problems.


Kurt Baumann                       InterCon Systems Corporation
703.709.9890                      Creators of fine TCP/IP products
703.709.9896 FAX               for the Macintosh.