Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!hybrid!scifi!bywater!uunet!microsoft!jimad
From: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
Subject: operator dot?
Message-ID: <70904@microsoft.UUCP>
Date: 26 Feb 91 18:29:33 GMT
Reply-To: jimad@microsoft.UUCP (Jim ADCOCK)
Organization: Microsoft Corp., Redmond WA
Lines: 1

Does anyone know what happened to consideration of overloadable operator dot?