Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!crackers!m2c!umvlsi!pswanson
From: pswanson@umvlsi.ecs.umass.edu (Paul Swanson)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Amiga coverage in Byte
Message-ID: <1566@umvlsi.ecs.umass.edu>
Date: 3 Mar 91 22:27:17 GMT
References: <1991Mar1.024207.29305@en.ecn.purdue.edu> <1991Mar1.112510.1947@sugar.hackercorp.com> <1991Mar2.004532.13380@midway.uchicago.edu>
Organization: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Lines: 10

In article <1991Mar2.004532.13380@midway.uchicago.edu> jcav@ellis.uchicago.edu (john  cavallino) writes:

[...]
>My point is that, however many Macs are actually out there, it is safe to
>assume that almost all of them can run current software.
>
Actually it is probably more accurate to say that only a few Macs can
run the current software and that the vast majority of them can only
walk it.  i.e. much current software requires a very fast Mac to get any
sort of reasonable response time.