Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!motcsd!starnet!sschaem
From: sschaem@starnet.uucp (Stephan Schaem)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: Announcement--new "Unicode" standard
Keywords: the kissable breasts of Yong-Mi (t.m. xanthian lust)
Message-ID: <1991Mar4.210455.1965@starnet.uucp>
Date: 4 Mar 91 21:04:55 GMT
References: <1991Feb24.164137.11897@cunixf.cc.columbia.edu> <1991Feb24.180148.21954@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1991Feb25.044130.8588@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG> <1991Feb25.080721.1628@zorch.SF-Bay.ORG>
Organization: Starnet Connections---Public Access UNIX
Lines: 13



 Well if you have more than 100,000 sign with 32 coding and a bitmap
 corespondance with a resolution of 32x32 (some sign are complex and at
 that point why not use 32 instead of 24:-).
 Well you just need 12 meg 'fonts'... of course they would be
 compacted:-)
 1024x1024x2 monitor will give you a 32x32 matrix, but 20x12 on 'normal'
 pc High resolution.
 I dont think really that you can make something really afordable for
 that 1 billion market share.
 That kind of thing is not to accepted as standart, and is curently used
 for buplishing and in that case they can do whatever they want!