Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!maverick.ksu.ksu.edu!hoss!fergvax!231b3678 From: 231b3678@fergvax.unl.edu (Phil Dietz) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics Subject: Re: Workbench 2.0 Display utility Message-ID: <1991Mar06.044021.25037@hoss.unl.edu> Date: 6 Mar 91 04:40:21 GMT References: <1991Mar4.165108.6571@janus.mtroyal.ab.ca> Sender: news@hoss.unl.edu (Network News Administer) Organization: Comp Sci and Engr, Univ. of Nebr. Lines: 34 In article <1991Mar4.165108.6571@janus.mtroyal.ab.ca> ewilts@janus.mtroyal.ab.ca (Ed Wilts) writes: >Although I generally pleased with the overall appearance and performance of >WorkBench 2.0, I am somewhat disappointed by Commodore's Display utility. >It appears that Mostra easily outperforms Display in the time it takes to view >a typical IFF file; on average I would say that Display is about 5 times slower >than Mostra on my 2 MB 3000-16 under 2.0 (36.207/36.69). > >I would appreciate any comments on Display's usefulness. Is Mostra faster >because it is short-cutting something? Is it simply using a better algorithm? > >[To prevent the usual barrage of questions about Mostra, it can be found on >Fish 330] > > .../Ed Preferrred: Ed.Wilts@BSC.Galaxy.BCSystems.Gov.BC.CA >Ed Wilts Alternate: EdWilts@BCSC02.BITNET (604) 389-3430 >B.C. Systems Corp., 4000 Seymour Place, Victoria, B.C., Canada, V8X 4S8 Just because it's from Commodore DOESN'T mean it's the best! Commodore supplied Display for the Amiga users without a modem or without a users group. We modemers on the otherhand can find all sorts of neat and BETTER alternatives over the network! :-) Take for instance Commodore LIST and DIR. They suck big time (with hardly any power whatsoever). We modemers can replace LIST with Newlist47 or ls-jr for REAL POWER!!! Phil Dietz --- University of Nebraska Phil Dietz // Computer Science 231b3678@fergvax.unl.edu \\// out the 235b4271@fergvax.unl.edu \/ Amiga!