Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!lll-winken!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!reed!intelhf!anvil.intel.com!griff From: griff@anvil.intel.com (Richard Griffith) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: DME on UNIX Message-ID: <1991Mar6.152559.24375@intelhf.hf.intel.com> Date: 6 Mar 91 15:25:59 GMT References: <1991Mar1.073634.6716@engin.umich.edu> <1991Mar1.153246.23111@intelhf.hf.intel.com> <1991Mar4.050955.21815@engin.umich.edu> Sender: news@intelhf.hf.intel.com (News User) Reply-To: griff@anvil.intel.com (Richard Griffith) Organization: Development Tools Operation, Intel Corp., Hillsboro OR Lines: 33 Nntp-Posting-Host: anvil In article , dillon@overload.Berkeley.CA.US (Matthew Dillon) writes: > From: dillon@overload.Berkeley.CA.US (Matthew Dillon) > Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer > Subject: Re: DME on UNIX > > In article <1991Mar4.050955.21815@engin.umich.edu> gilgalad@caen.engin.umich.edu (Ralph Seguin) writes: > >>Same Here! Make that thing "X"-able (?!) under 3.0 and above! Pls? > >Hi. Actually, I think that X should not be used. I would like to be able to > >run it on ANY sort of platform. Although, running inside an xterm would be > >fine. > You guys don't ask for much, do you? !?! > > -Matt > -- > > Matthew Dillon dillon@Overload.Berkeley.CA.US > 891 Regal Rd. uunet.uu.net!overload!dillon > Berkeley, Ca. 94708 > USA well, maybe I'm just being naive, but it seems to me that if you have it running under Intuiition, it would be a relatively short step to X. I'd hate to loose the "iconificaiton" and multi-window capabilities of dme.... :Richard E. Griffith, "griff" : iNTEL, Hillsboro Ore. :griff@anvil.hf.intel.com :SCA!: Cyrus Hammerhand, Household of the Golden Wolf, Dragons' Mist, An Tir :These are MY opinions, if iNTEL wanted them, They'd pay for `em!