Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!squishy From: squishy@casbah.acns.nwu.edu (Shishin Yamada) Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.8bit Subject: Re: 65C02? Keywords: 6502, 65C02, 6502C Message-ID: <1991Mar7.200615.24433@casbah.acns.nwu.edu> Date: 7 Mar 91 20:06:15 GMT References: <1991Mar5.110713.24023@cs.city.ac.uk> <16595@chopin.udel.edu> Organization: Northwestern University Lines: 32 Ooops, sorry, I guess I'm wrong. The 65C02 must have TTL line drivers installed. I dunno if it would make the computer faster however, since it is still clocked at the same clock speed, and the peripheral interfaces are still the same type (I think the XE series has upgraded PIAs). But, I would like to hear from those that modifed it. The key advantage to CMOS technology is that it requires very little power, but its drawbacks are speed and also driving devices. CMOS requires little power because in CMOS technology power is consumed only when switching between logical states (0-1 or 1-0 transitions). Very little power is used in the steady-state logic outputs. This can possibly be a problem, especially if there are pull-up or pull-down resistors somewhere, since it may not keep the correct logic values (Should not be a problem if line-driver is installed though). If you decide to modify it, you MUST be careful to observe CMOS static handling procedures, as a static shock could fry the chip's oxide layers. Basically this means the best protection is to only handle the chip with something like a static wrist strap (available cheap from Radio Shack) to ground your body. I'd like to hear how it comes out! ===================================================== Shishin "Squish" Yamada |\/\/\/| squishy@casbah.acns.nwu.edu /---------\ | | Northwestern University | Yo | (o)(o) | Electrical Engineering | Dudes! \ ( < ) Class of 1991 \__________\ |___/ | \ | "Life sucks, but Death swallows!" / \ /______\ =====================================================