Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!sarah!bingnews!bingsuns.pod.binghamton.edu!consp24
From: consp24@bingsuns.pod.binghamton.edu (consp24)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm
Subject: Re: 1700 RAM Expander
Message-ID: <1991Mar5.014057.8465@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu>
Date: 5 Mar 91 01:40:57 GMT
References: <1991Mar3.005544.24466@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu>
Sender: usenet@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu (Mr UseNet)
Reply-To: consp24@bingsuns.pod.binghamton.edu (consp24)
Organization: SUNY Binghamton
Lines: 15
Nntp-Posting-Host: bingsuno.pod.binghamton.edu

I checked the 1764 REU docs....  They say that the 1700 has 64 kbit chips
while the 1764 and 1750 have 256 kbit chips.  Do the 64 kbit chips need
to be replaced with 256 kbit ones?

If anyone has done an upgrade on the 128K 1700 REU, I'd appreciate knowing
the differences between what's in the docs for the 1764 and what needs to 
be done for the 1700.

Thanks.

Gregg Riedel
consp24@bingsuns.pod.binghamton.edu

P.S.  The final bug fixes and compilations are being done for Unix 128 v3.00
Milton should get a copy soon... (Scott- I'll be in touch real soon...)