Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!sarah!bingnews!bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu!consp24 From: consp24@bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu (consp24) Newsgroups: comp.sys.cbm Subject: Re: Gotta report this Message-ID: <1991Mar5.151632.13860@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu> Date: 5 Mar 91 15:16:32 GMT References: <6932.27D32767@zswamp.fidonet.org> Sender: usenet@bingvaxu.cc.binghamton.edu (Mr UseNet) Reply-To: consp24@bingsuns.cc.binghamton.edu (consp24) Organization: SUNY Binghamton Lines: 16 Nntp-Posting-Host: bingsunp.pod.binghamton.edu >Overheard in my office today: > >"D'ya think an X-Windows terminal for the C64 would go down well?" > - Matthew Desmond (of DesTerm fame) > >It'll go down *slow*, I say. > >"In that case, I'll wait 'till next week", he says. Actually, the IBM VGA X software I saw wasn't TOO bad, although it did have a ethernet line running to it. But seriously... I just can't see the 1200x900 Sun SPARCstation1 I'm running X on right now being faithfully reproduced on a 64 in 320x200 mode. Maybe an Xterm for the 128 in interlace mode, though.... Gregg Riedel consp24@bingsuns.pod.binghamton.edu