Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.ircc.ohio-state.edu!csn!spot.Colorado.EDU!frechett
From: frechett@spot.Colorado.EDU (-=Runaway Daemon=-)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds
Subject: Re: HP 48SX Rom REV F -- nope!
Message-ID: <1991Mar6.020835.23879@csn.org>
Date: 6 Mar 91 02:08:35 GMT
References: <38784@netnews.upenn.edu>
Sender: news@csn.org (news)
Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
Lines: 22
Nntp-Posting-Host: spot.colorado.edu

In article <38784@netnews.upenn.edu> sternlie@eniac.seas.upenn.edu (Paul E. Sternlieb) writes:
>So, I think that they're sort of cracking down on these upgrades.
>Anyway, sorry to ruin your party, but that's just what
>Corvallis tells me!
That is what Calc support tells you.  That is not what Mary Hornbergerm, who
handles upgrades, has been implying.  As for them cracking down on this upgrade
thing, I agree fully, and that is why I believe that is why that are telling
you that there is no Version F even though products from HP for the 48 are
saying that they came from a Version F machine.  They are probably a bit fed up
with the whole thing and are not anxious to debate whether you should have an E
of F.  I suspect that they will get rid of every last E they can probably
hoping that they upgrade offer will be over by then.  Then they will release
the F.  
    I am not going to complain and I am not going to call hp.  I will probably
sell me E and buy the F but that doesn't bother me at all.  Remember when
someone asked how many would be willing to spend $50 to upgrade...?  

We'll see.

	ian

-=Runaway Daemon=-