Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!jarthur!nntp-server.caltech.edu!palmer From: palmer@nntp-server.caltech.edu (David Palmer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer Subject: Re: Serial Driver Routines in Think C Message-ID: <1991Mar6.070905.6190@nntp-server.caltech.edu> Date: 6 Mar 91 07:09:05 GMT References: <1991Mar05.185523.758@digibd.com> <1991Mar6.043429.20081@unx2.ucc.okstate.edu> Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Lines: 58 minich@unx2.ucc.okstate.edu (Robert Minich) writes: >This is just a personal gripe, but I feel the need to vent some spleen: > >Inside Mac VI damn well better be ready as soon, if not before, Sys 7 is >in users' hands. I can't afford to buy all the pieces that Apple offers >(Comm Toolbox, for one) that will be part of Sys 7, especially since I'll >have to get IM VI anyway for all the other goodies! I don't make any money >off my programming and I certainly can't afford any official developer >type status. Is Apple going to screw me by being slow on the release of >this info to the general public? I hope not. Can anyone from Apple comment >via this group or email? I hope so. :-) > with all the hype about talking of Sys 7 so developers will have running >apps at release, plus the delays of the software, is it not reasonable to >have documentation RSN? I need to vent the same spleen. Apparently, Inside Mac VI and all the other documentation is just sitting there on bric-a-brac.apple.com (aka ftp.apple.com) just waiting for someone to shoot the lawyers and reset a few file protection bits. I don't know how to use the sound manager, I don't know how to use the sound-input manager, I don't know how to use the serial ports (on the IIfx, which has been out for years) I don't know how to use inter-app communications, or even what it will be like so I can design my code to integrate it later. All I have access to is the technotes (those more than 7 months old) and the ancient Inside Mac books. NONE of the machines that were available at the time the last Inside Mac Volume was released are still in production. Is it too much to ask that the people who can't afford to spend thousands of dollars on documentation at least have a source that will allow them to write software for the beast? How about an ETO CDROM (I don't know what ETO stands for, I can't afford the initiation rites that would reveal that knowledge to me) that has all the high-cost development systems disabled? That way it could be sold for an affordable price (as opposed to the $900 it costs now), poor people could read it on their bargain-basement, 1200 ms seek-time CD_ROM drives, (bought just so that they could use SpInside Mac) and maybe you would see some innovative new software from people who have more ideas than money. Nah, on second thought, why bother. Nothing could ever come of one or two guys developing something in their garage. All the exciting stuff comes from the big companies, like Lotus ('Jazz' revolutionized the way we think of spreadsheets) and Microsoft ('Word' revolutionized the way we think about the Mac User Interface.) OK, my spleen is now vented. You can stop reading now. -- David Palmer palmer@gap.cco.caltech.edu ...rutgers!cit-vax!gap.cco.caltech.edu!palmer "Operator, get me the number for 911" --Homer Simpson