Xref: utzoo news.groups:28518 comp.text:8106 comp.unix.misc:1063 comp.unix.sysv386:5726
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!wotan!moxie!sugar!ficc!peter
From: peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Newsgroups: news.groups,comp.text,comp.unix.misc,comp.unix.sysv386,comp.xenix.sco
Subject: Re: 2nd CFV and VOTE ACK: comp.apps hierarchy
Message-ID: <2OX9S=7@xds13.ferranti.com>
Date: 6 Mar 91 16:41:05 GMT
References: <$+8-HA=@rpi.edu>
Sender: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva)
Reply-To: peter@taronga.hackercorp.com (Peter da Silva)
Organization: Xenix Support, FICC
Lines: 21

In article <$+8-HA=@rpi.edu> apps@telly.on.ca writes:
> The three groups are to be voted on together. I am not interested in
> seeing the comp.apps level created without an orderly way of putting
> groups underneath it.

All you need for that is to create one group: comp.apps.misc.

You have my vote already. Whether it's a YES or NO is up to you. Right now
it's a NO, but you can change that real quick.

(for those who have tuned in late, there is nothing in the guidelines to
 support creating multiple groups with a single vote)

> This proposal is a combination of majority rule and
> consensus among the many messages that were mailed and posted on the
> subject during June and December 1990.

It's also invalid by the generally accepted guidelines.
-- 
Peter da Silva.  `-_-'  peter@ferranti.com
+1 713 274 5180.  'U`  "Have you hugged your wolf today?"