Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!news.cs.indiana.edu!msi.umn.edu!cs.umn.edu!brsmith From: brsmith@cs.umn.edu (Brian R. Smith) Newsgroups: comp.unix.amiga Subject: Re: Amiga 2500UX ?? Message-ID: <1991Mar6.230610.11322@cs.umn.edu> Date: 6 Mar 91 23:06:10 GMT References: <1991Mar5.054615.26136@kessner.denver.co.us> <1231@amix.commodore.com> <1991Mar6.033824.10225@cs.umn.edu> <1991Mar6.190721.27760@csun.edu> Distribution: usa Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, CSci dept. Lines: 41 In <1991Mar6.190721.27760@csun.edu> bcphyagi@csunb.csun.edu (Stephen Walton) writes: >In article <1991Mar6.033824.10225@cs.umn.edu> brsmith@cs.umn.edu (Brian R. >Smith) writes: >>>I think at least 8 meg of ram is a requirement to run X on any >>>platform. >>Hardly a "requirement". I've managed to get by on a 4 meg diskless >>sun 2. >I wonder how...I'm told by our systems people here that with both X >and OpenLook under SunOS 4.1.1, a screen refresh after a window drag >is a 30 second operation (!!!) on a 4 MB diskless Sun 3/50 (12 MHz >68020). This was under SunOS 3.4 and the MIT X server, without much besides the X server and an xterm or three running. There were many other (faster) machines on the net for things like xfig, idraw, window managers, etc. Response time was limited mostly by processor speed, not swap speed. OpenWindows and 4.1.1 are gluttonous on memory. The X11/NeWS server tends to take at least twice as much memory as a straight X server. (Yes, it does more, but those extras are NOT X.) I can see them grinding a 4 meg machine into the ground - especially with swap over the net. >Of course, he may have had GNU Emacs in a window... You need a dedicated machine for that, of course. Something like a six processor Sequent. :-) I suppose I shouldn't open my mouth until I see it and play with it, BUT, I think a 4meg 3000UX with local swap should be usable with X. With only one user. With most of the common daemons disabled. Without "too many" X clients. Ok, maybe 8 meg would be a lot better... :-) -- Brian