Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!uunet!rbj
From: rbj@uunet.UU.NET (Root Boy Jim)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards
Subject: Re: usable of attached shared memory (done by parent) in child process?
Message-ID: <124817@uunet.UU.NET>
Date: 6 Mar 91 19:55:53 GMT
References: <26156@adm.brl.mil>
Organization: UUNET Communications Services, Falls Church, VA
Lines: 11

In article <26156@adm.brl.mil> TAYBENGH%NUSDISCS.BITNET@cunyvm.cuny.edu writes:
?Dear Unix-Wizards,
?        I have implemented a simple message-passing utility using SysV shared
?memory. I have an question of the use of shared memory after the process
?fork(). The question is:

The question is really: why do this when System V (and most everyone else)
provide you with message queues?
-- 
		[rbj@uunet 1] stty sane
		unknown mode: sane