Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!infonode!ingr!ne3005!point!ken From: ken@point.ne1300.ingr.com (Ken Poore) Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms Subject: Re: GeoWorks Ensemble: any comments? Message-ID: <2600@ne3005.ingr.com> Date: 6 Mar 91 15:58:31 GMT References: <13085@helios.TAMU.EDU> Sender: usenet@ne3005.ingr.com Lines: 47 tony@cs.tamu.edu (Tony Encarnacion) writes: >Has anybody used GeoWorks Ensemble, another window manager for PCs? >How does it compare to Windows 3.0? >From the GeoWorks brochure, they claim that it can run on just 512K >on an XT and has Motif-compliant interface. It comes with a text >processor, a drawing program, etc. but I did not see mention of >program development. I have a copy of it here in my office, and for a novice computer user, it is *far* better than Windows 3.0 (I also have a copy of Windows). A friend of mine has been contacted as a possible developer for a database engine for Geoworks, so you can expect a decent DB interface soon. I like Windows, too, but it is hell to set up and configure properly, especially for the novice. I say this because of the troubles I've had (I've been using PC's for 8 years), and complaints I regularly see in trade journals. Sure, Windows has tons more applications going for it, and there are several development toolkits available, but for a new user, GeoWorks has all the right tools. It's great for a portable, except that it *must* have a mouse; and won't install until you have one. Geoworks sports an excellent rolodex, a decent calendar (kinda like Alamanac, but not quite as good), nice file manager, adequate communications software, a pretty good word processor (no search and replace, who cares!?), and a very good draw program with very good scalable fonts. One thing Windows has going for it is the ability to run non-Windows apps in Window's windows. Geoworks can only 'shell' out and run them. Again, this is fine for about 80% of the users (again, thinking novice). Someone posted a while ago that it blew away his hard disk, but I haven't seen it happen in the 5 installs I've witnessed. Right now (as of about 6 weeks ago) GeoWorks did not have a commercial developer's library available, but it was promised real soon, now. All in all, it's an excellent first release. It's not a Windows clone, by any means; you can tell this by the minimum resources required. If it catches on at all, I think it'll be a serious contender. In my opinion, it's what Windows should have been. -- |Ken Poore |TIM Appl. Specialist, Intergraph Corporation | |poore@ingr.com forwarded to | Region V Technical Services | |ne1300!point!ken | Reston, Virginia | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------