Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!info-high-audio-request
From: chrisc%gold.gvg.tek.com@RELAY.CS.NET (Chris Christensen)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: Re: Twenty generations of DAT copies...
Message-ID: <10018@uwm.edu>
Date: 7 Mar 91 13:59:03 GMT
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Lines: 23
Approved: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu


In article <9981@uwm.edu> tristram%conan.asd.sgi.com@SGI.COM writes:
>See Mix, April 1991...
>
>A maniac at Mix magazine took selections...............

I believe that Jim Paul's article in MIX was very interesting.  It is
always humorous  to note reactions to professional audio persons
subjective evaluations of sound.  Your comment in "quotes" seemed to
indicate animosity towards this type of person.  I consider myself a
professional audio person and fully admit that I don't understand all
I know about audio,  but I am  successful in my endeavors.  I won't
make any assumptions as to your experience in audio but I will say
this and DON'T QUOTE ME please.

Most professional audio people don't consider themselves audiophiles.

I believe that Jim Paul and the MIX editorial staff had honorable intentions in presenting this article.

Please feel free to flame, but understand that my intentions are in
defense of my industry.

Chris Christensen