Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!ora!ambar
From: gazit@cs.duke.edu (Hillel Gazit)
Newsgroups: soc.feminism
Subject: Re: Scholarly objective evaluations of AA
Summary: patronized feminism
Message-ID: <667506522@lime.cs.duke.edu>
Date: 7 Mar 91 20:49:33 GMT
References: <1991Feb15.090335.19134@xanadu.com> <666712518@lear.cs.duke.edu> <1991Feb24.192139.1421@xanadu.com>
Sender: ambar@ora.com (Jean Marie Diaz)
Organization: The Piranha Club
Lines: 19
Approved: ambar@ora.com

#Do you try to claim that your "scholarly objective evaluations of AA", is
#more valid, with respect to "white ethnic males", then their experiences?!

In article <1991Feb24.192139.1421@xanadu.com> nadja@xanadu.COM (Nadja Adolf) writes:

>I would agree with Lurkette that scholarly studies are probably more
>accurate than the perceptions of ethnic males; 

I wonder what you will say after "scholarly studies" will tell you
that women are better off when they have to sit at home and raise
kids...

(And *please* read in "The Feminine Mystique" about the situation when
the "scholarly studies" said so, before you answer.)

Hillel                                                   gazit@cs.duke.edu

"When I do it to you it's sexism,
when you do it to me it's feminism."