Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!haven!mimsy!mojo!SYSMGR@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU
From: sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Am386 release?
Message-ID: <009458A1.42C717A0@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU>
Date: 13 Mar 91 14:50:18 GMT
References: <27d84e3c.3f6a@petunia.CalPoly.EDU> <TOM.91Mar11071917@rcx1.ssd.csd.harris.com> <27dc4882.1b54@petunia.CalPoly.EDU>,<1991Mar13.002330.16671@amd.com>
Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (C-News)
Reply-To: sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney)
Organization: The U. of MD, CP, CAD lab
Lines: 18

In article <1991Mar13.002330.16671@amd.com>, phil@brahms.amd.com (Phil Ngai) writes:

>The Am386 still hasn't been formally announced yet (coming very soon!),
>but some gunmen stole a substantial number of them (in a speed grade
>not offered by Intel) while they were on their way to the airport. (see
>current EET)
>
>I guess this is the only way to get a hot Am386, since they use
>so little power.

Euhh, there's two types of Am386. One is the 40Mhz "hot" chip; the other a
25Mhz CMOS implementation. I don't think they've put the 40Mhzer into CMOS
(yet). 

     Reform may be dying in the Soviet Union, but we have the right to 
                introduce it to the DECUS Board of Directors. 

  -- >                  SYSMGR@CADLAB.ENG.UMD.EDU                        < --