Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!integow!hot
From: hot@integow.uucp (Roland van Hout)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Re: Fax Quality
Message-ID: <1526@integow.uucp>
Date: 8 Mar 91 08:55:14 GMT
References: <3833.27d6468f@hayes.uucp>
Organization: Integrity BV, Woerden, the Netherlands
Lines: 19

From article <3833.27d6468f@hayes.uucp>, by tnixon@hayes.uucp:
> In article <7120@emory.mathcs.emory.edu>, km@mathcs.emory.edu (Ken
> Mandelberg) writes: 
> You'll also see a significant difference between V.32 and 9600bps 
> fax on the same quality phone line.  Because of trellis coding, V.32 
> can tolerate about 4dB worse signal-to-noise ratio and achieve the 
> same bit error rate as V.29.  If your circuit is only fair, you 
Does this mean we would be able to connect to a fax machine with
V.32 and then we can send faxes if we have/make appropriate software?
So we would use our T2500 to send faxes.

bye
Roland

-- 
UUCP: ..!uunet!mcsun!hp4nl!integow!hot	or  hot@integow.UUCP 
Roland van Hout, Sr. software engineer, Integrity software consultants, 
         Pelmolenlaan 2, 3447 GW Woerden, Netherlands,
            tel +31 3480-30131, fax +31 3480-30182