Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!hayes!tnixon
From: tnixon@hayes.uucp
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.fax
Subject: Re: Fax Quality
Message-ID: <3842.27da8a2f@hayes.uucp>
Date: 10 Mar 91 19:34:07 GMT
References: <3833.27d6468f@hayes.uucp> <1526@integow.uucp>
Organization: Hayes Microcomputer Products, Norcross, GA
Lines: 24

In article <1526@integow.uucp>, hot@integow.uucp (Roland van Hout)
writes: 

> From article <3833.27d6468f@hayes.uucp>, by tnixon@hayes.uucp:
>> In article <7120@emory.mathcs.emory.edu>, km@mathcs.emory.edu (Ken
>> Mandelberg) writes: 
>> You'll also see a significant difference between V.32 and 9600bps 
>> fax on the same quality phone line.  Because of trellis coding, V.32 
>> can tolerate about 4dB worse signal-to-noise ratio and achieve the 
>> same bit error rate as V.29.  If your circuit is only fair, you 
>
> Does this mean we would be able to connect to a fax machine with
> V.32 and then we can send faxes if we have/make appropriate software?
> So we would use our T2500 to send faxes.

No, not at all.  I was simply comparing the performance of V.32 and 
V.29, and didn't imply that V.32 that you could send faxes with 
V.32.

-- 
Toby Nixon, Principal Engineer    | Voice   +1-404-840-9200  Telex 151243420
Hayes Microcomputer Products Inc. | Fax     +1-404-447-0178  CIS   70271,404
P.O. Box 105203                   | UUCP uunet!hayes!tnixon  AT&T    !tnixon
Atlanta, Georgia  30348  USA      | Internet       hayes!tnixon@uunet.uu.net