Path: utzoo!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!atget.cc.utexas.edu!spurgeon From: spurgeon@atget.cc.utexas.edu (Charles Spurgeon) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.lans Subject: Re: Ethernet performance degradation? Keywords: PC, NFS, Novell, Netware, DOS Message-ID: <45323@ut-emx.uucp> Date: 8 Mar 91 14:38:37 GMT References: <1991Mar7.220351.9761@uhura1.uucp> <1991Mar7.221028.9883@uhura1.uucp> Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp Reply-To: spurgeon@atget.cc.utexas.edu (Charles Spurgeon) Distribution: usa Lines: 56 In article <1991Mar7.221028.9883@uhura1.uucp>, bryan@uhura1.uucp (Bryan Curnutt) writes: |>I've also heard (though I don't know how true it is) that Ethernet |>network performance degrades drastically if too many nodes are added |>to the network, and that the number of nodes to do this is relatively |>small. Is there any truth to this? Every Ethernet, indeed every LAN no matter what the technology used, has a different equipment mix and load profile, so your mileage will vary. On the other hand, there are no special limits to host population/traffic on an Ethernet other than those listed in the spec (for example, 100 transceivers per thick Ethernet segment, 30 connections per thin Ethernet segment, 1024 addressable stations per Ethernet system linked with repeaters). There have been a number of papers written about performance on various simulations of "Ethernet like" networks. These simulations seem to be the ones cited when people are describing "hard limits" in the Ethernet protocol. For some empirical tests of Ethernet performance that show what the real Ethernet protocol can deliver, check out the DEC Technical Report listed below: Measured Capacity of an Ethernet: Myths and Real- ity David R. Boggs, Jeffrey C. Mogul, Christopher A. Kent. Proceedings of the SIGCOMM '88 Symposium on Com- munications Architectures and Protocols, ACM SIGCOMM, Stanford, CA., August 1988, 31 pps. From the Abstract: "Ethernet, a 10 Mbit/sec CSMA/CD network, is one of the most successful LAN technologies. Considerable confu- sion exists as to the actual capacity of an Ethernet, especially since some of the theoretical studies have examined operating regimes that are not characteristic of actual networks. Based on measurements of an actual implementation, we show that for a wide class of appli- cations, Ethernet is capable of carrying its nominal bandwidth of useful traffic, and allocates the bandwidth fairly." This paper is also available over the Internet via electronic mail from the DEC Western Research archive server. Send a message to the following address with the word "help" in the Subject line of the message for detailed instructions. The address is WRL- Techreports@decwrl.dec.com. You may also request a copy of the report through the U.S. postal system by writing to: Technical Report Distribution DEC Western Research Laboratory, UCO-4 100 Hamilton Avenue Palo Alto, California 94301