Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!hsdndev!rutgers!cmcl2!uupsi!jpradley!jpr From: jpr@jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: Telebit T2500 -> TB+ UUCP spoofing problem, HELP Keywords: uucp spoofing T2500 TELBIT Message-ID: <1991Mar10.014710.27032@jpradley.jpr.com> Date: 10 Mar 91 01:47:10 GMT References: <554@shograf.COM> <1991Mar4.030916.3429@bilver.uucp> <1991Mar7.204240.5497@jts.com> Organization: NYC Public Unix Lines: 22 In article <1991Mar7.204240.5497@jts.com> gerry@jts.com (G. Roderick Singleton ) writes: >In article <1991Mar4.030916.3429@bilver.uucp> bill@bilver.uucp (Bill Vermillion) writes: > jim@shograf.COM (jim morris) writes: >I asked a similar question about three weeks ago ( Iknow I promised to summarize) >and then went on vacation. My confguartion at the time was 2-TB+'s with 5.01 ROMs, >but things got so bad during the first week I was away that I came in and put the 4.00 >ROMs back. VOILA! The problems went away and I've been able to absorb and handle >the recent news flood in Toronto ( handled 300 Mb in 3.5 days ) with no uucp/modem >problems. This suggests, to me, that Telebit has bugs in recent versions of their >TB+ code which affect uucp performance. > >I shall post my summary when I, eventually, get answers from Telebit. [Could you please not post lines that exceed 80 chars.? or better not over 78 chars.?] A month ago, I upgraded a Trailblazer Plus to Version 7 ROM. Since then, the majority of my major Usenet downloads end in FAILURE, and my feed is complaining. Maybe I should put the old chips back in? Jean-Pierre Radley NYC Public Unix jpr@jpradley.jpr.com CIS: 72160,1341