Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!lll-winken!ames!ucsd!pacbell.com!tandem!netcom!gandrews
From: gandrews@netcom.COM (Greg Andrews)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: SCO Unix uucico RTS/CTS (was re:T2500 -> TB+ spoofing problem)
Summary: Could it be uuchat instead of uucico?
Keywords: uucp spoofing T2500 TELBIT
Message-ID: <27682@netcom.COM>
Date: 11 Mar 91 05:50:26 GMT
References: <1991Mar05.051051.27651@jpradley.jpr.com> <1991Mar7.214200.20682@hq.demos.su> <1991Mar10.014152.26911@jpradley.jpr.com>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services  UNIX System {408 241-9760 guest}
Lines: 22

In article <1991Mar10.014152.26911@jpradley.jpr.com> jpr@jpradley.jpr.com (Jean-Pierre Radley) writes:
>
>   [quoting his earlier post]
>
>>>Whatever I do in my dialTBIT binary, or any chat script, SCO's uucico will
>>>ALWAYS set:  -ctsflow -rtsflow -ixon -xoff -ixany.
>>
>

That's on dial-out.  What does it do for dial-in if you have CTSFLOW
enabled in your /etc/gettydefs?

Are you certain it's uucico doing that?  Could it be uuchat as the
Systems file chat script is processed?  (just a thought, and I don't
know how to run dialTBIT and uucico on the port without uuchat in
between...)


-- 
.-------------------------------------------.
| Greg Andrews      |   gandrews@netcom.COM |
`-------------------------------------------'